The petition was dismissed as infructuous because the prayer had already become rendered so.
The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Serial No.317
Chief Justice's Court
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 17008 of 2018
Petitioner :- Subesh Singh @ Sube Singh and another Respondent :- State of U.P. and others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Mr. Uma Nath Pandey, Advocate Counsel for Respondent :- Mr. A.K. Roy, Additional Chief Standing Counsel for respondent Nos.1 and 3
Hon'ble Rajesh Bindal,Chief Justice Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the prayer made in the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous.
The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as infructuous.
Date :- 14.12.2021 AHA/Kuldeep
(Piyush Agrawal, J.) (Rajesh Bindal, C.J.)
Subesh Singh @ Sube Singh
State of U.P.
Rajesh Bindal
Piyush Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
