The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn, as counsel for the petitioner submitted that the prayer had already been granted and no further adjudication was required.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 29
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 16883 of 2021
Petitioner :- Jaipal Singh Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Vinod Kumar Agarwal,. Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Kaushalendra Nath Singh
Hon'ble Pritinker Diwaker,J. Hon'ble Ashutosh Srivastava,J.
Sri V.K. Agarwal, counsel for the petitioner and Sri Kaushalendra Nath Singh, counsel for the Development Authority.
Counsel for the petitioner submits that whatever relief has been prayed in the writ petition, has already been granted to the petitioner and as such, no further adjudication is required.
The petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn.
Order Date :- 24.11.2021 RK
Jaipal Singh
State of U.P.
Another
Pritinker Diwaker
Ashutosh Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
