M/S Taj Hotel v. State of U.P. and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition adjudged a non-prosecuted file and dismissed due to absence of the petitioner's counsel to press the matter.
Writ petition adjudged a non-prosecuted file and dismissed due to absence of the petitioner's counsel to press the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 6
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 16823 of 2010 Petitioner :- M/S Taj Hotel Respondent :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Petitioner :- S.S. Shah Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J.
Matter is taken up in the revised call. None appears on behalf of the petitioner to press the writ petition. The name of the counsel for the petitioner is shown in the cause list.
The writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution.
Interim order, if any, is vacated.
Order Date :- 22.10.2021 Pravin
M/S Taj Hotel
State of U.P.
Ajay Bhanot
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court