The High Court held that the writ petition was infructuous based on the petitioner's own submission. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition without adjudication on merits.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 40
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1438 of 2021
Petitioner :- Peeyush Prakash Gupta Respondent :- Bar Council Of India And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Udayan Nandan,Sr. Advocate Shri Shashi Nandan Counsel for Respondent :- Rohan Gupta
Hon'ble Munishwar Nath Bhandari,J. Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.
Sri Shubham, Advocate holding brief of Sri Udayan Nandan, learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has become infructuous.
In view of the statement made above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 29.1.2021 Ashish Pd.
Digitally signed by Justice Digitally signed by Justice Rohit Munishwar Nath Bhandari Ranjan Agarwal Date: 2021.02.01 17:00:29 IST Date: 2021.02.01 17:02:16 IST Reason: Document Owner Reason: Document Owner Location: High Court of Judicature at Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Allahabad
Peeyush Prakash Gupta
Bar Council Of India
Others
Munishwar Nath Bhandari
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
