The writ petition for challenging a recovery certificate was dismissed. The court held that since the underlying adjudication was not challenged, the recovery certificate being a consequential order could not be set aside separately.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 18
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 12682 of 2010
Petitioner :- M/S Saumya Sweets Respondent :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Deepak Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J.
Recovery certificate is only a consequential order of adjudication. The order of adjudication has not been challenged.
The writ petition is dismissed.
Order Date :- 15.11.2021 Dhananjai
M/S Saumya Sweets
State of U.P.
Ajay Bhanot
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
