Jai Ram v. State of U P and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The single judge dismissed the writ petition seeking expedited proceedings in a civil case pending before the Tehsildar, finding no sufficient ground for urgency.
The single judge dismissed the writ petition seeking expedited proceedings in a civil case pending before the Tehsildar, finding no sufficient ground for urgency.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 2
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 11437 of 2021
Petitioner :- Jai Ram Respondent :- State Of U P And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vinay Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Suneet Kumar,J.
This petition has been filed to expedite the Case No. T202005310500025 (Pushpa Devi vs. Jairam), pending before Tehsildar, Tehsil Chauri Chaura, District Gorakhpur.
I have gone through the records and find no good ground to expedite the proceedings of the aforesaid case.
In view thereof, the petition is dismissed with liberty to the applicant to approach the court below by making an appropriate expedite application. In the event such an application is made, it is expected that the same shall be heard and decided, in accordance with law.
Order Date :- 12.8.2021 S.Prakash
Jai Ram
State Of U P
2 Others
Suneet Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court