Smt. Urmila Devi v. State of U.P. and 4 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner's claim for release of family pension became infructuous after the pension was released in January 2021 following a supplementary affidavit.
The petitioner's claim for release of family pension became infructuous after the pension was released in January 2021 following a supplementary affidavit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 36
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 8851 of 2020
Petitioner :- Smt. Urmila Devi Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anand Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal,J.
Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record.
Sri Anand Kumar Singh learned Advocate for the petitioner, at the outset, states that the prayer in this writ petition has been addressed at the ends of respondents and family pension to the petitioner has been released in the month of January, 2021.
In view of the above statement and averments in the supplementary affidavit, the writ petition is rendered infructuous.
Dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 19.1.2021 Harshita
Urmila Devi
State Of U.P.
Sunita Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court