Narendra Singh v. State of U.P. and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Held infructuous and dismissed a writ petition after respondents' counsel admitted that all outstanding dues to the petitioner had been paid.
Held infructuous and dismissed a writ petition after respondents' counsel admitted that all outstanding dues to the petitioner had been paid.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 2
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6672 of 2021
Petitioner :- Narendra Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sumit Kumar,Neelabh Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ravindra Singh
Hon'ble Suneet Kumar,J.
Sri Ravindra Singh, learned counsel appearing for respondents, at the outset, submits that the entire outstanding dues admissible to the petitioner has been paid. This fact is not being disputed by learned counsel for the petitioner.
In view thereof, the petition has rendered infructuous.
Dismissed accordingly.
Order Date :- 27.9.2021 P. Sri.
Narendra Singh
State Of U.P.
2 Others
Suneet Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court