The petition in this writ application was dismissed for want of prosecution as no appearance was made by the petitioner when the case was listed peremptorily.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 35
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 49739 of 2015
Petitioner :- Aaditya Narayan Rai Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- J.S. Pandey,Lallan Prasad Pal Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,A.N. Srivastava,Sandeep Kumar
Hon'ble Vivek Agarwal,J.
None for the petitioner.
Sri Pranav Ojha, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State and Sri Gyanendra Pratap Singh, learned counsel for proposed respondent no. 3, are present.
As nobody is appearing for the petitioner, though, case is listed peremptorily, petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 5.10.2021 Vikram/-
Aaditya Narayan Rai
State of U.P.
Vivek Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
