Court No. 36 dismissed a writ petition filed by Dinesh Kumar challenging an order relieving him from posting. The court held that the challenge was unsustainable as it pertained to a relieving order rather than a transfer order, and the petitioner did not appear to press the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 36
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3992 of 2020
Petitioner :- Dinesh Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Gopal Verma,Roshni Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pranesh Dutt Tripathi
Hon'ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal,J.
None appears on behalf of the petitioner to press the writ petition.
Sri P.D. Tripathi learned counsel for the respondent No.2 is present.
A perusal of the writ petition indicates that the order dated 28.02.2020 relieving the petitioner pursuant to the transfer order dated 29.06.2019 has been filed in the month of March' 2020. There is no challenge to the transfer order. The challenge to the order relieving the petitioner from the place of posting, therefore, cannot be sustained.
The writ petition is dismissed , accordingly.
Order Date :- 21.1.2021 Himanshu
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition challenging a relieving order is maintainable when the petitioner does not press the petition.
Dinesh Kumar
State Of U.P.
Sunita Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
