Veer Singh v. State of U.P. and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3762 of 2021…
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3762 of 2021…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 2
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3762 of 2021
Petitioner :- Veer Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pankaj Kumar Gupta,Chandra Pal Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ashish Mishra
Hon'ble Suneet Kumar,J.
Heard leaned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the Sate and Sri Rahul Srivastava, learned counsel for the private respondent.
By the instant petition, the petitioner is seeking a direction to Administrative Judge of District Judgeship, Moradabad to decide the Appeal No. Nil of 2019 (Veer Singh v. State of U.P. and another) within stipulated period.
Sri Rahul Srivastava, learned counsel appearing for respondent, on instruction, submits that the appeal (annexure no.11 to the petition) has not been received. He further submits that the memo of appeal filed along with the writ petition can be considered and decided on merits provided the petitioner consents to that effect.
Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instruction, submits that the petitioner would have no objection in the event the appeal at annexure no. 11 is considered and decided by the competent authority.
In view thereof, on consent, the writ petition is disposed of directing the second respondent to ensure that the appeal is decided expeditiously by means of a reasoned and speaking order.
Order Date :- 27.8.2021 Kuldeep
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Administrative Judge of District Judgeship, Moradabad should be directed to decide the pending appeal expeditiously.
Veer Singh
State Of U.P.
Suneet Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court