The High Court dismissed a writ petition as infructuous because the petitioner was reinstated, rendering the dispute moot. No further substantive decision or order was issued beyond this procedural disposition. The judgment does not elaborate on legal propositions or provide detailed reasoning.
The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 6
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3618 of 2021
Petitioner :- Bhanu Pratap Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sujeet Kumar Rai Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Nikhil Kumar
Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
The counsel for the petitioner states that the matter has become infructuous as the petitioner has been reinstated.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Order Date :- 15.7.2021 Puspendra
Bhanu Pratap Singh
State Of U.P.
2 Others
Pankaj Bhatia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
