The single-judge court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous. Any interim order was vacated. Counsel for the petitioner argued the petition was no longer viable.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous; interim order, if any, was vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 2
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3383 of 2011
Petitioner :- Ram Ashrey Prasad Respondent :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Satyawan Shahi,Sri. Ashok Khare Counsel for Respondent :- C. S. C.
Hon'ble Suneet Kumar,J.
Sri Satyawan Shahi, learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that the petition has rendered infructuous.
The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as infructuous.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 13.9.2021 K.K. Maurya
Ram Ashrey Prasad
State of U.P.
Suneet Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
