The High Court disposed of the writ petition seeking directions to permit the petitioner's regular duty and payment of honorarium. The Court directed respondents to decide the claim via a reasoned order within three months.
Pass a reasoned order on the petitioner's claim to be filed within two weeks, to be decided within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 6
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3343 of 2021
Petitioner :- Raman Kant Subodh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ramendra Singh Pal,D.K.Ojha Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.
" (a). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents permit to the petitioner for giving his regular duty on account of appointment order dated 09.09.2016 and also paid honorarium to the petitioner as per guideline (annexure no... to this writ petition). "
Order Date :- 19.7.2021 AHA
Raman Kant Subodh
State Of U.P.
Saumitra Dayal Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
