Dr. Jai Prakash Narain Rao v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
This court allowed the writ petition holding that ad-hoc service rendered by the petitioner counts as qualifying service. The petitioner is entitled to pension on a month-to-month basis from the date of superannuation, with arrears to be computed and released within three months.
What did the court decide?
Impugned order set aside. Petitioner entitled to pension including ad-hoc service. Respondent directed to pay arrears with 6% interest within three months.