Santosh Kumar v. State of U.P. and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition under Art. 226 by Santosh Kumar dismissed for want of prosecution as no one appeared in court.
Writ petition under Art. 226 by Santosh Kumar dismissed for want of prosecution as no one appeared in court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 36
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 12459 of 2020
Petitioner :- Santosh Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dharmendra Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal,J.
The case has been called out. No one has put in appearance to press the present petition.
The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 1.2.2021 P Kesari
Santosh Kumar
State Of U.P.
Sunita Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court