The court dismissed a PIL seeking removal of encroachment, observing that the petitioner has a statutory remedy under the U.P. Revenue Code 2006 and no judicial interference is warranted.
The petition seeking removal of encroachment was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 5
Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 1853 of 2021
Petitioner :- Pawan Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ramdhan,Ram Dular Patel Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Rameshwar Prasad Shukla
Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.
Order Date :- 2.12.2021 Faraz
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Court should interfere in the removal of encroachment petition.
Pawan Kumar
State Of U.P.
Saumitra Dayal Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
