Allowed

State of U.P. through Secretary,Basic Education and 3 Others v. Ashwani Kumar Awasthi and 3 Others

Allahabad HC27 Jan 2021SPLA/11/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Special Appeal against an order of the Single Judge in a writ petition regarding payment of stipend. The Single Judge failed to address the issue raised regarding a subsequent government order/corrigendum dated 14.05.2015. The Special Appeal was allowed with direction to set aside the impugned order and remit the case to the Single Judge for a fresh decision addressing all prayers. The modificatio

What did the court decide?

Impugned order dated 03.02.2020 set aside with remand of the case to the learned Single Judge to be decided afresh in reference to all the prayers made by the petitioners in writ petition.

State of U.P. through Secretary,Basic… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Allahabad HC (2021)

¶1

Court No. - 40

¶2

Case :- SPECIAL APPEAL No. - 11 of 2021 Appellant :- State Of U.P. Through Secretary,Basic Education And 3 Others Respondent :- Ashwani Kumar Awasthi And 3 Others Counsel for Appellant :- Anand Kumar Ray Counsel for Respondent :- Rahul Mishra

¶3

Hon'ble Munishwar Nath Bhandari,J. Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.

¶4

By this appeal a challenge is made to the impugned order dated 03.02.2020 passed by the learned Single Judge on a writ petition preferred by the nonappellant with the following prayers;

¶5

"(a) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari, quashing the impugned order dated 18.05.2016 passed by respondent no. 1 and office order/corrigendum dated 14.05.2015 also be quashed.

¶6

(b) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent no. 2 make immediate payment of remaining stipend amount as mentioned in the Government Order dated 14.01.2004 in Para 3 (12) till his appointment as Assistant Teacher with interest 18%.

¶7

(c) Issue any other writ, order or direction in the nature of which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.

¶8

(d) Award the cost of the petition to the petitioners."

¶9

The writ petition has been decided in reference to the earlier litigation and the Government Order dated 14.01.2004, without addressing the issue raised in reference to the subsequent government order/corrigendum dated 14.05.2015. By the aforesaid order, a modification was made in regard to the benefit of stipend. It was made limited to the period of training after entering into Special B.T.C. course.

¶10

The issue in reference to the government order/corrigendum dated 14.05.2015 has not been addressed effectively by any of the Court, though, a review petition preferred by the State Government before the Apex Court has been dismissed but the judgment aforesaid does not propound a ratio.

¶11

Taking into consideration aforesaid and as prayed by learned counsel for the parties, the impugned order dated 03.02.2020 passed by the learned Single Judge is set-aside with remand of the case to the learned Single Judge to be decided afresh in reference to all the prayers made by the petitioners in writ petition.

¶12

Appeal is allowed with the direction given above.

¶13

Order Date :- 27.1.2021 Shekhar

State of U.P. through Secretary,Basic Education and 3 Others v. Ashwani Kumar Awasthi and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

State of U.P. through Secretary,Basic Education and 3 Others v. Ashwani Kumar Awasthi and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Reena Singh Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Shubhawati Devi Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Himanshu Pradhan Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Sheo Ratan Yadav Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

State of U.P. through Principal Secretary , Home and 4 Others Vs Vinesh Kumar Yadav (Steno) (Confidential)

Dinesh Kumar Yadav Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others