Writ petitioner counsel stated the petition is infructuous. Court dismissed the habeas corpus writ petition accordingly.
Writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 46
Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 392 of 2021
Petitioner :- Smt. Tinkal And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ravi Sahu Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Surya Prakash Kesarwani,J. Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J.
Sri Sanjai Kumar Sahu holding brief of Sri Ravi Sahu, learned counsel for the petitioners states that the writ petition has become infructuous and it may be dismissed as infructuous.
In view of the aforesaid, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 5.8.2021
samz
Smt. Tinkal And Another
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Surya Prakash Kesarwani
Piyush Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
