Case :- FIRST APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 201 of…
The appeal was disposed of as it was time-barred and the condonation of delay was dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 77
Case :- FIRST APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 201 of 2009
Appellant :- Surendra Singh Respondent :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Appellant :- Madan Mohan,Utpal Chatterji Counsel for Respondent :- Mahendra Pratap
Hon'ble Rajendra Kumar-IV,J.
As per office report, learned Counsel for the appellant has not taken steps.
None responds for the appellant. Learned Standing Counsel is present.
This appeal has been filed as time barred with application of delay condonation, which is still pending, to be decided.
The Delay Condonation Application for delay in filing the aforesaid appeal is hereby dismissed for want of prosecution.
Appeal is also disposed off accordingly.
Order Date :- 1.11.2021 I.A.Siddiqui
Surendra Singh
State of U.P. and Others
Rajendra Kumar-IV
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
