The First Appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution as the appellants failed to appear. However, liberty was granted to seek revival of the appeal within four weeks.
Liberty granted to seek revival of the appeal on merits within four weeks from today.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 37
Case :- FIRST APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 132 of 1989
Appellant :- Raghubeer And Others Respondent :- State Counsel for Appellant :- Kr. R.C.Singh,B.D. Sharma,Chandra Bhan Dubey,P.N. Tripathi,Samar Singh,Shyam Singh Sengar,Surya Bhan Dubey
Hon'ble Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker,J. Hon'ble Subhash Chand,J.
The appeal is of the year 1989. The last application was filed by Sri C.B. Dubey, learned counsel for the appellants. Sri Shyam Singh Sengar, learned counsel for the appellants has also filed an application, but none have appeared today even in the revised call. Learned counsel for the State is present.
We have no other option left but to dismiss the appeal, as this is the defective appeal of the year 1989. The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
However, liberty is granted to seek revival of the appeal on merits within four weeks from today.
Order Date :- 28.9.2021 AK Pandey
Raghubeer And Others
State
Kaushal Jayendra Thaker
Subhash Chand
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
