Appeal No. 354 of 2011 called in revision was dismissed for want of prosecution because the appellant's counsel was absent while the respondent's counsel was present.
Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 21
Case :- FIRST APPEAL No. - 354 of 2011
Appellant :- Darshan Lal Bohra Respondent :- Noida And Another Counsel for Appellant :- Sharad Mandhyan Counsel for Respondent :- Saurabh Srivastava
Hon'ble Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker,J. Hon'ble Ajai Tyagi,J.
Called in revise.
Sri Sharad Mandhayan, learned counsel for the appellant is absent. Sri Saurabh Srivastava, learned counsel for the respondent is present.
Appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 14.12.2021 DKS
Darshan Lal Bohra
Noida
Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker
Ajai Tyagi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
