First Appeal disposed of on account of compromise between parties. Court substituted judgment with the compromise and partly allowed the appeal under Section 96 CPC.
Appeal partly allowed by substituting judgment with the recorded compromise.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 21
Case :- FIRST APPEAL No. - 127 of 2019
Appellant :- Ashia Mehfooz And 2 Others Respondent :- Sheikh Ethesham Uddin Ahmad And 3 Others Counsel for Appellant :- Ashok Shankar Bhatnagar,Divakar Rai Sharma
Counsel for Respondent :- S.Kashif A.Rizvi, S. Kashif ,Harsh Vardhan Gupta,Pranjal Mehrotra
Hon'ble Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker,J. Hon'ble Ajai Tyagi,J.
Learned counsel for the appellant is present. However, none is present on behalf of the respondents.
It is stated by Shri Divakar Rai Sharma, learned counsel for the appellants that parties have already compromised and compromise application No.4 of 2019 is also placed on record.
Therefore, the appeal shall stand disposed of in view of the compromise and parties shall abide by the compromise. We substitute this judgement by the compromise.
This appeal u/s 96 C.P.C. is partly allowed.
We are thankful to Shri Divakar Rai Sharma, learned counsel for the appellants for ably assisting this Court.
Order Date :- 10.12.2021 Ashutosh Pandey
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ashia Mehfooz And 2 Others
Sheikh Ethesham Uddin Ahmad And 3 Others
Kaushal Jayendra Thaker
Ajai Tyagi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
