The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution as no one appeared on behalf of the appellant to press the matter; an interim order was vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 1
Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER No. - 517 of 1994
Appellant :- N.I.A. Co. Ltd. Respondent :- Pratibha Devi Counsel for Appellant :- Vinod Swarup,Kartikey Saran,Vineet Saran Counsel for Respondent :- D.K. Jaiswal
Hon'ble Vivek Agarwal,J.
Case called out in the revised list. None appears on behalf of the appellant to press this appeal.
The appeal is dismissed for want of prosocution.
Interim order, if any, shall stand vacated.
Let this fact be notified to the concerned Tribunal so that they may proceed with the execution of the award.
Order Date :- 5.1.2021 Arif
N.I.A. Co. Ltd.
Pratibha Devi
Vivek Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
