The Hon'ble Court dismissed the appellant's appeal against the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's award holding the bus involved in the accident. The Court rejected the contentions regarding false implication, erroneous spot map, and lack of examination of the bus number inspector.
Appellant to bear cost of Rs. 10,000/-.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 1
Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER No. - 43 of 2021
Appellant :- Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation Respondent :- Kusum And 5 Others Counsel for Appellant :- Jitendra Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- Mayank
Hon'ble Vivek Agarwal,J.
criminal cases s not applicable for the matters under Motor Vehicles Act.
Order Date :- 22.1.2021 Ashutosh
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the appeal against the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal award challenging the involvement of the bus in the accident and the veracity of the FIR deserves to be allowed.
Whether the plea of false implication by the appellant being made out in absence of false implication contentions.
Whether the spot map not being proved by the appellant raises any doubt about the place of the accident.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation
Kusum and 5 Others
Vivek Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
