The single judge dismissed an appeal for non prosecution as the appellant's counsel was absent despite prior notices, indicating lack of interest in continuation of litigation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 21
Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER No. - 236 of 1992
Appellant :- Gopi Chandra And Anothers Respondent :- M/S Rameshwar Dayal Gupta And Others Counsel for Appellant :- H.M. Srivastava
Hon'ble Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker,J.
This is an appeal of the year 1992.
Learned counsel for the appellants has absented himself today even on earlier occasions also.
It seems to us that the appellant is not interested in continuing with the litigation.
We have no other option but to dismiss the appeal.
In view of the above, this appeal stands dismissed for non prosecution.
Order Date :- 14.12.2021 A.N. Mishra
Gopi Chandra And Anothers
M/S Rameshwar Dayal Gupta And Others
Kaushal Jayendra Thaker
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
