The appellant's first appeal from an order was allowed to be withdrawn by the High Court on the grounds of previous decisions covering the issue.
Appeal allowed to be withdrawn; directive regarding remittance of Section 173 deposit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 1
Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER No. - 2122 of 2010
Appellant :- Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd. Respondent :- Smt. Rashmi Devi And Ors. Counsel for Appellant :- S.K. Mehrotra Counsel for Respondent :- M.K.Gupta
Hon'ble Vivek Agarwal,J.
Sri S.K. Mehrotra, learned counsel for the appellant submits that issue involved in this appeal is already covered by various pronouncements of Hon'ble Supreme Court and this High Court and since, issue is covered, he does not wish to burden the Court with unnecessary adjudication in the matters covered by previous decisions of this Court.
On his request, appeal is allowed to be withdrawn . If any amount under Section 173 has been deposited, then that be remitted to the learned claims tribunal to be adjusted against the amount to be disbursed in favour of the claimants or for refund, as the case may be.
Order Date :- 27.1.2021 Vikram/-
Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd.
Smt. Rashmi Devi And Ors.
Vivek Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
