The revisionist did not wish to press the present revision due to subsequent developments. The court dismissed the revision.
None
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 84
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 988 of 2021
Revisionist :- Vivek Sisodia Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Ram Prakash Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.
Sri Ram Prakash Pandey, learned counsel for the revisionist states that in view of the subsequent developments the revisionist does not wish to press the present revision.
The revision stands accordingly dismissed.
Order Date :- 9.8.2021 Imroz
(Dr. Y. K. Srivastava, J.)
Vivek Sisodia
State of U.P.
Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
