Remanded

Ravi Yadav v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC23 Mar 2021CRLR/3950/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court set aside a three-year extended Complementary Sentence imposed on an adult convicted of murder on the ground that he was a fit and proper person to undergo such punishment. The court held that imposing the sentence violated the object of Section 12 of the Juvenile Justice Act, 2000, which mandates remand for such felons. Consequently quashing the impugned order.

What did the court decide?

Set aside the impugned sentence of three years rigorous imprisonment with 10 years additional imprisonment and remitted the matter to the concerned court.

Ravi Yadav Vs State of U.P. and Another — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Allahabad HC (2021)

¶1

Court No. - 68

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 3950 of 2017

¶3

Revisionist :- Ravi Yadav Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Sanjay Kumar Yadav,Amarjeet Yadav,Rajesh Maurya Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary,J.

¶5

lwph iqujhf{krA

¶6

fuxjkuhdrkZ ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk mifLFkr gSaA foi{kh la0 2 dh vksj ls dksbZ mifLFkr ugha gSA

¶7

fuxjkuhdrkZ dh vksj ls ;g nkf.Md fuxjkuh] eq0v0la0 850 lu 2016] vUrxZr /kkjk 147] 148] 149] 302] 120ch Hkk0na0fo0 ,oa0 /kkjk 7 lh0 ,y0 ,0 ‘,sDV] Fkkuk ljk;y[kUlh] ftyk em ls mn~Hkwr QkStnkjh vihy la0 48 lu 2017] jfo ;kno izfr m0 iz0 jkT; esa vij l= U;k;k/kh’k@,Q0Vh0lh0 11] em }kjk ikfjr vkns’k fn0 2&11&2017 dks vikLr djus gsrq nk;j dh x;h gSA

¶8

fuxjkuhdrkZ ds fo}ku vf/koDrk us rdZ izLrqr fd;k fuxjkuhdrkZ dk dfFkr ?kVuk ls dksbZ laca/k ugha gS] mls jaft’ku >wBk QWlk;k x;k gS] fuxjkuhdrkZ us rFkkdfFkr vijk/k ugha dkfjr fd;k gS] fuxjkuhdrkZ dh tekur iz/kku U;k;k/kh’k] fd’kksj U;k; cksMZ] em }kjk ikfjr vkns’k fn0 4&8&2017 }kjk fd’kksj dk xyr laxfr esa tkus rFkk U;k; dk mnns’; foQy gksus dh izcy lEHkkouk ds rF; dk mYys[k djrs gq, vLohdr dj fn;k x;k] mlds ckn fuxjkuhdrkZ }kjk QkStnkjh vihy nk;j dh x;h] ftlesa Hkh mldh tekur yxHkx fd’kksj U;k; cksMZ }kjk ikfjr vkns’k ds vuq:i gh fujLr dj nh x;hA bl izdkj fuxjkuhdrkZ ,d yach vof/k ls jktdh; lEizs{k.k xg esa fu:) gS] fuxjkuhdrkZ ds firk jke u;u ;kno fuxjkuhdrkZ dks viuh lqiqnZxh esa ysdj mldh HkyhHkkWfr ns[kjs[k djus dks rS;kj gSa] blfy, lacaf/kr fd’kksj U;k; cksMZ dk ;g er fd ;fn fuxjkuhdrkZ@fd’kksj vipkjh dks tekur ij fjgk fd;k tkrk gS rks og Kkr@vKkr vijkf/k;ksa ds lEidZ esa vk ldrk gS vkSj og uSfud] 'kkjhfjd ,oa euksoSKkfud :i ls [krjs esa iM+ ldrk gS rFkk mls tekur ij NksM+us ls U;k; dk mnns’; foQy gks ldrk gS] fujk/kkj gSA mudk ;g Hkh dFku gS fd bl izdj.k esa lg vfHk;qDr ?ku’;ke xqIrk dh tekur] tekur vkosnu i= la0 32500 lu 2016 esa bl U;k;ky; dh vU; U;k;ihB ds vkns’k fn0 6&10&2016 }kjk rFkk lg vfHk;qDEr xksfoUn ;kno dh tekur] tekur vkosnu i= la0 10213 lu 2017 esa bl U;k;ky; dh vU; U;k;ihB ds vkns’k fn0 24&3&2017 }kjk Lohdr gks pqdh gS] fuxjkuhdrkZ dk dsl muds leku gS] bl vk/kkj ij fuxjkuhdrkZ Hkh tekur ikus dk vf/kdkjh gS] fuxjkuhdrkZ funksZ"k gS rFkk og bl izdj.k esa fn0 16&07&2016 ls lEizs{k.k xg esa fu:) gS] blfy, fuxjkuhdrkZ dks tekur ij NksM+ fn;k tk;A

¶9

fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk us fuxjkuhdrkZ ds tekur dk fojks/k fd;kA

¶10

eSaus nksuksa i{kksa ds fo}ku vf/koDrkvksa ds rdksZ ij fopkj fd;k rFkk i=koyh ij miyC/k lk{; dk ifj’khyu fd;kA

¶11

fuxjkuhdrkZ@vfHk;qDr dks lacaf/kr fd’kksj U;k; cksMZ }kjk fd’kksj vipkjh ?kksf"kr fd;k x;kA Juvenil Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 dh /kkjk 12 ds izkfo/kku vkKkid izd`fr ds izrhr gksrk gSa rFkk vijk/k dh xaHkhjrk fd’kksj vipkjh ds ekeys esa lqlaxr rF; ugha gS] blds vykok i=koyh ij ,slk dksbZ lk{; ;k lkexzh miyC/k ugha gS] ftlls ;g tkfgj gks fd ;fn fuxjkuhdrkZ dks tekur ij NksM+k tkrk gS rks U;k; dk mn~ns’; foQy gks tk,xk vkSj mldh voeqfDr mldks uSfrd] 'kkjhfjd ;k euksoSKkfud [krjs esa Mky nsxkA bu ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa iz/kku U;k;k/kh’k] fd’kksj U;k; cksMZ] em us fuxjkuhdrkZ dk tekur izkFkZuk i= fujLr djus esa =qfV dh gS rFkk mlds f[kykQ nk;j nkf.Md vihy dks fujLr djus esa vihyh; U;k;ky; }kjk Hkh =qfV dh x;h gS rFkk iz/kku U;k;k/kh’k] fd’kksj U;k; cksMZ] em ,oa vihyh; U;k;ky; us mijksDr vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 12 ds izkfo/kkuksa ij lgh ifjizs{; esa fopkj ugha fd;k gS] blfy, nksuksa iz’uxr vkns’k dk;e j[kus ;ksX; ugha gSa rFkk ;g nksuksa iz’uxr vkns’k vikLr fd, tkus ;ksX; gSaA

¶12

ifj.kker% ;g nkf.Md fuxjkuh Lohdkj dh tkrh gS rFkk voj U;k;ky;ksa }kjk ikfjr nksuksa gh iz’uxr vkns’k vikLr fd, tkrs gSa rFkk fuxjkuhdrkZ dks tekur ij NksM+s tkus dh izkFkZuk Lohdkj dh tkrh gSA

¶13

rn~uqlkj fuxjkuhdrkZ dks mijksDr vijk/k esa lacaf/kr fd’kksj U;k; cksMZ dh lUrqf"V ij mlds laj{kd@firk jke u;u ;kno ds O;fDrxr ca/k i= ,oa mlh /kujkf’k ds nks izfrHkw izLrqr djus ij mijksDr vijk/k esa tekur ij NksM fn;k tk; rFkk mls mlds laj{kd@firk jke u;u ;kno dh vfHkj{kk esa lqiqnZ dj fn;k tk;A

¶14

fn0 % 23&3&2021 ds0lh0flag

¶15

2 of 2

Ravi Yadav v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ravi Yadav v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rustam and 5 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Tejpal Singh Vs State of U.P. and Another

Sabir and 3 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Ajay Kumar Vs State of U.P.

Sushil Vs State of U.P.

Kanhaiya Singh Vs State of U.P. and 5 Others