Revision against the Supreme Court's order quashing anticipatory bail granted under Section 438 CrPC due to lack of countervailing circumstances, held to be futile, and order quashed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 85
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 2722 of 2021
Revisionist :- Basheer Khan Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Saurabh Tripathi,Sohit Prakash Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Kamaluddin Khan
Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary,J.
fuxjkuhdrkZ dh vksj ls ;g nkf.Md fuxjkuh] eq0v0la0 318 lu 2015] vUrxZr /kkjk 363] 366] 376 (?k)d Hkk0na0fo0 ,oa 5@6 ikLdks ,sDV ls mn~Hkwr l= ijh{k.k la0 43 lu 2016 esa vij l= U;k;k/kh’k@Lis’ky tt] ikLdks ,sDV] vyhx<+ }kjk ikfjr vkns’k fn0 8&9&2021 ds fo:) nk;j dh x;h gSA
fuxjkuhdrkZ ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks lquk rFkk i=koyh dk ifj’khyu fd;kA
fuxjkuhdrkZ ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk dFku gS fd lacaf/kr voj U;k;ky; }kjk iz’uxr vkns’k ikfjr djrs le; lk{;ksa dh vuns[kh dh x;h gS] mudk mfpr ewY;kadu ugha fd;k x;k gS] foi{kh }kjk fy[kk;h x;h izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ eux<+Ur] vlR; ,oa Hkzked rF;ksa ij vk/kkfjr gS] fuxjkuhdrkZ us rFkkdfFkr vijk/k dkfjr ugha fd;k gSA mudk ;g Hkh dFku gS fd mijksDr ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa fo}ku voj U;k;ky; }kjk vfHk;qDr ds fo:) ikfjr iz’uxr vkns’k =qfViw.kZ gS] blfy, iz’uxr vkns’k vikLr fd, tkus ;ksX; gSA
fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk us bldk fojks/k fd;kA
eSaus fuxjkuhdrkZ ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ds rdksZ ds ifjizs{; esa i=koyh ij miyC/k lk{; ,oa iz’uxr vkns’k dk ifj’khyu fd;kA
fo}ku voj U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr iz’uxr vkns’k leqfpr foospuk ij vk/kkfjr gSa ,oa ldkj.k vkns’k gS rFkk lacaf/kr voj U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr iz’uxr vkns’k mfpr gS] mlesa dksbZ lkjoku vfu;ferrk ;k vukSfpR;rk ;k dksbZ izfdz;k ;k {ks=kf/kdkj laca/kh =qfV ifjyf{kr ugha gksrh gSA vr% iz’uxr vkns’k dks vikLr djus lacaf/kr fuxjkuhdrkZ dh izkFkZuk fujLr fd, tkus rFkk iz'uxr vkns'k iq"V fd, tkus ;ksX; gSA
rn~uqlkj ;g nkf.Md fuxjkuh fujLr dh tkrh gS rFkk mijksDr okn esa voj U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr iz’uxr vkns’k dh iqf"V dh tkrh gSA
dk;kZy; dks funsZ’k fn;k tkrk gS fd bl vkns’k dh ,d izfrfyfi lacaf/kr voj U;k;ky; dks vfoyEc Hkstuk lqfuf’pr fd;k tk;A fn0 % 01&11&2021 ds0lh0flag
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the impugned appellate order is maintainable without formal findings on countervailing circumstances under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
Basheer Khan
State of U.P.
Gautam Chowdhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
