Remanded

Sri Saddiq v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC22 Sept 2021CRLR/1250/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In Criminal Revision No. 1250 of 2020, the Court directed notice to opposite parties and granted interim bail to the convicted revisionist, Saddiq, pending the disposal of the revision against his sentence in an Arms Act case, requiring his bond and two solvent sureties.

What did the court decide?

Granted interim bail to the revisionist upon furnishing a personal bond and two solvent sureties from family members/relatives.

Sri Saddiq Vs State of U.P. — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Allahabad HC (2021)

¶1

Court No. - 85

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1250 of 2020

¶3

Revisionist :- Sri Saddiq Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Revisionist :- Dharmendra Kumar Mishra,Kamaluddin Khan,Kashi Nath Singh Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary,J.

¶5

This criminal revision has been filed by the revisionist against the judgment and order dated 29.2.2020 passed by Addl. Sessions Judge, Court No.5, Aligarh, in Criminal Appeal No. 143 of 2017 (Saddiq v. State of U.P.) whereby the appeal preferred on behalf of revisionist has been dismissed and the order dated 5.6.2017 passed by the A.C.J.M., Court No.3, Aligarh in Case No. 359 of 2014 (State vs. Saddiq) u/s 5/25 Arms Act, P.S.- Madrak, District Aligarh has been affirmed whereby the revisionist has been convicted and sentenced to undergo three years simple imprisonment with fine of Rs. 2,000/- with default stipulation.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the revisionist, who has pressed forth the revision only on the ground of severity of sentence, and learned A.G.A. for the State.

¶7

Perused the record.

¶8

Notice on behalf of opposite party no.1 has been accepted by learned A.G.A.

¶9

Issue notice to the opposite party no.2 returnable within four weeks.

¶10

Opposite party no.2 may file counter affidavit within three weeks after the service. Learned A.G.A. may also file counter affidavit within the same period. Rejoinder affidavit may be filed within two weeks thereafter.

¶11

List this matter immediately after expiry of the aforesaid period along with lower court record before the appropriate bench.

¶12

In the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, let the revisionist Saddiq , convicted and sentenced in Case No. 359 of 2014 (State vs. Saddiq), u/s 5/25 Arms Act, P.S.- Madrak, District Aligarh, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two solvent sureties each of his family members and/or relatives to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

¶13

As soon as personal and surety bonds are furnished, photocopies of the same are directed to be transmitted to this Court forthwith by the concerned court below to be kept on record.

¶14

Order Date :- 22.9.2021 Vandana

Sri Saddiq v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri Saddiq v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Alamara and Another Vs State of U.P. and Another

Km. Shweta and 3 Others Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Nafees Ahmad Vs State of U.P. and Another

Naim Vs State of U.P. and Another

Suraj Vs State of U.P. and Another

Sanjay and 3 Others Vs State of U.P. and Anothers