Held that the writ petition is not maintainable as the impugned order is appealable under the U.P. Control of Goondas Act, 1970, and the petition is devoid of merits.
The writ petition is dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy as it is devoid of merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 44
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 7225 of 2021
Petitioner :- Piyush Kant Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kailash Nath Singh Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Mrs. Sadhna Rani (Thakur),J.
Since the order impugned is appealable under the U.P. Control of Goondas Act, 1970 before the appellate authority concerned, therefore, the writ petition is not maintainable before this Court, at this stage.
The writ petition is devoid of merits and is dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy.
Order Date :- 2.9.2021 Gss
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition is maintainable before this Court when the impugned order is appealable under the U.P. Control of Goondas Act, 1970.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Piyush Kant Yadav
State Of U.P.
2 Others
Sunita Agarwal
Sadhna Rani (Thakur)
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
