A Single Judge dismissed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition as infructuous after the police had already submitted the charge sheet and the court below had taken cognizance of the offence.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 46
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 5929 of 2021
Petitioner :- Vinti Gupta And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Prateek Tyagi,Prateek Tyagi,Vikas Sharma Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Atiqur Rahman Siddiqui,Gaurav Tiwari
Hon'ble Surya Prakash Kesarwani,J. Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary,J.
None appears for the petitioners.
Sri Rishi Chaddha, learned A.G.A. for the State-respondents and Sri Gaurav Tiwari, learned counsel for the informantrespondent No.3 are present.
Learned counsel for the informant-respondent No.3 and learned A.G.A. jointly state that charge sheet has already been submitted by the Police and the court of Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Court No.3, Kanpur Nagar, has also taken cognizance on 29.9.2021.
In view of the aforesaid, the writ petition has become infructuous and, therefore, is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 7.10.2021 Vandana
Vinti Gupta And Another
State Of U.P.
Surya Prakash Kesarwani
Gautam Chowdhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
