The High Court dismissed the criminal miscellaneous writ petition under Article 226 as an alternative remedy by way of appeal under Section 6 of the U.P. Control of Goondas Act, 1970, was available against the impugned order.
Writ petition dismissed without expression of opinion on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 48
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 562 of 2021
Petitioner :- Pawan Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Raj Kumar Dhama Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Surya Prakash Kesarwani,J. Hon'ble Shamim Ahmed,J.
Against the impugned order dated 25.11.2020 under Section 3/4 U.P. Control of Goondas Act, 1970, the petitioner has a right of appeal under Section 6 of the Act. Therefore, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this writ petition is dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy of appeal available to the petitioner against the impugned order before the competent authority.
Order Date :- 22.1.2021 mt
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to maintain a writ petition when an appeal lies under Section 6 of the Control of Goondas Act.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Pawan
State Of U.P.
2 Others
Surya Prakash Kesarwani
Shamim Ahmed
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
