The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous because the State had recalled the transfer order underlying the petition.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 44
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 5186 of 2021
Petitioner :- Saroj Kumar Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 11 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sunil Kumar Srivastava,Padmaker Pandey
Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Gaurav Singh
Hon'ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Mrs. Sadhna Rani (Thakur),J.
The affidavit filed on behalf of the State is taken on record.
Sri AKhilesh Kumar holding brief of Sri S.K.Srivastava states that the order of transfer has been recalled by the State.
In view of the above, the writ petition is rendered infructuous.
The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 5.10.2021 Gss
Saroj Kumar Singh
State Of U.P.
Sunita Agarwal
Sadhna Rani Thakur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
