Kamlesh Tandon v. State of U.P. and 6 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. -…
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. -…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 46
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 389 of 2020
Petitioner :- Kamlesh Tandon Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ram Prakash Dwivedi,Dileep Kumar(Senior Adv.),Rajrshi Gupta Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Pankaj Satsangi
Hon'ble Surya Prakash Kesarwani,J. Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J.
Sri Ram Prakash Dwivedi, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the writ petition has become infructuous and it may be dismissed as infructuous.
In view of above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 27.7.2021 Rahul Dwivedi/-
Kamlesh Tandon
State Of U.P.
Surya Prakash Kesarwani
Piyush Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court