Sadhna v. State of U.P. and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous since the charge sheet has been filed.
What the court decided
Court No. - 45
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 230 of 2021
Petitioner :- Sadhna Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Faizan Siddiqui,Manjur Mohammad Ansari
Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Pritinker Diwaker,J. Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.
Shri Faizan Siddiqui for the petitioner and Shri Rajiv Lochan Diwedi, learned AGA for the State respondents.
State counsel submits that now charge sheet has been filed and as such the writ petition has become infructuous. The petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Order Date :- 10.2.2021 nethra
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sadhna
- respondent
State Of U.P.
Coram
Pritinker Diwaker
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLP/230/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court