Pradeep Lal Srivastava v. State of U.P. and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought quashing of an FIR and directed against arrest under Sections 406 and 409 IPC. The High Court of UP held the FIR disclosed a cognizable offence, rejected quashing, and directed petitioner to seek anticipatory or regular bail separately.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition dismissed; F.I.R. not quashed; no stay on arrest; to apply for bail separately.