Allowed

Ram Pravesh Puri v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC20 Jan 2021CRLA/660/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The appellant challenged a bail rejection order in a case under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The bench observed that the appellant had previously been on bail and had surrendered. After hearing both sides, the Single Judge allowed the appeal and set aside the rejection order, granting bail.

What did the court decide?

The impugned order rejecting bail is set aside. The appellant is released on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each of like amount.

Ram Pravesh Puri Vs State of U.P. and Another — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2021)

¶1

Court No. - 88

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 660 of 2020

¶3

Appellant :- Ram Pravesh Puri Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Appellant :- Rakesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the appellant-applicant and learned Additional Government Advocate for the State respondent.

¶6

This Criminal appeal under Section 14-A(2) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 has been preferred by the appellant with the prayer to set aside the order dated 4th December, 2019 passed by Additional Session Judge/ Special Judge, SC/ ST Act, Court No.2, Ghazipur in Second Bail Application No.- 1600 of 2019 in Special Criminal Case No. 15 of 2014 arising out of Case Crime No.- 548 of 2013, under Sections 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. and Section 3(1)(X) of SC/ST (P. & A.) Act, Police StationBahariyabad, District- Ghazipur.

¶7

Learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that earlier the applicant was enlarged on bail, however, he could not appear on the date fixed in the case under trial in court below and accordingly non-bailable warrant was issued against him and subsequently the applicant surrendered and applied for bail which has come to be rejected vide order dated 4th December, 2019.

¶8

Learned counsel for the appellant assures that the appellant will not any further jump the bail if once again indulgence is granted in favour of the appellant.

¶9

Learned Additional Government Advocate has opposed the bail application of the appellant-applicant.

¶10

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and having gone through the entire record including the order by which, bail application of the appellant-applicant has been rejected, impugned herein this appeal and having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view that appellant was earlier granted bail, complicity of accused, I am of the view that the appellant has made out a case for bail subject of course, that he will not jump the bail nor, even otherwise misuse his liberty.

¶11

Accordingly, this appeal is allowed and the impugned order dated 4th December, 2019 rejecting the bail of the appellant is set aside.

¶12

Let the above named accused-appellant involved in the aforesaid crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of Court concerned subject to the condition that applicant shall cooperate in the trial and will not jump the bail any further.

¶13

The concerned Court/ Authority/ Official is further directed to verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.

¶14

Order Date :- 20.1.2021 A.Kr.

Ram Pravesh Puri v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ram Pravesh Puri v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Randheer Singh Vs State of U.P. and Another

Arvind Vs State of U.P. and Another

Mohammad Iliyas Alias Juganu Vs State of U.P. and Another

Rani and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Shani @ Sarvesh Kumar Gupta Vs State of U.P. and Another

Mahipal Vs State of U.P. and Another