Malkhan v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
A criminal appeal where the appellant had died during pendency. The single-judge bench dismissed the appeal as abated.
What did the court decide?
Dismissed the appeal as having abated due to death of the appellant.
What the court decided
Court No. - 77
Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 588 of 1986
Appellant :- Malkhan Respondent :- State of U.P. Counsel for Appellant :- P.C. Misra Counsel for Respondent :- A.G.A.
Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
The office report indicates that the sole appellant has died during the pendency of the appeal, as such the appeal is dismissed as having abated.
Order Date :- 15.6.2021 S. Rahman
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Malkhan
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Pankaj Bhatia
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · June
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLA/588/1986
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court