Allowed

Ghanaram Pal @ Vindrawan v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC13 Aug 2021CRLA/3139/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal appeal seeking to set aside the rejection of a bail application, the Special Court allowed the appeal, holding that the appellant had made out a case for bail, considering the co-accused had already been granted bail under identical circumstances.

What did the court decide?

The impugned order rejecting bail is set aside. The appellant is released on bail on personal bonds and two sureties each of the like amount, subject to cooperation in trial.

Ghanaram Pal @ Vindrawan Vs State of U.P. and… — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Allahabad HC (2021)

¶1

Court No. - 50

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 3139 of 2021

¶3

Appellant :- Ghanaram Pal @ Vindrawan Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Appellant :- Ajay Sengar Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Vinay Kumar Singh

¶4

Hon'ble Arvind Kumar Mishra-I,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the appellant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material available on record.

¶6

This Criminal Appeal under Section 14-A (2) of SC/ST Act as Amended, has been preferred by the appellant with the prayer to set aside the order dated 13.01.2021, passed by Special Judge S.C. & S.T. Act, Jalaun at Orai in Case Crime No. 0780 of 2020, under Sections - 323, 504, 506 & 364-A Indian Penal Code, 1860 and 3(2)(V) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, Police Station - Kotwali-Orai, District - Jalaun.

¶7

Contention, in brief, is that similarly circumstanced co-accused - Bablu Pal has already been admitted to bail by coordinate Bench of this Court in Criminal Appeal No.146 2021 on 15.06.2021, copy whereof has been produced by the appellant, the same is taken on record. The case of the present appellant is identical to that of co-accused, who has already been admitted to bail. In case the appellant is admitted to bail, there is no possibility of his absconding or misusing the liberty of bail. The appellant has no criminal history and is languishing in jail since 25.10.2020.

¶8

Learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the appellant.

¶9

I have considered the rival submissions so made and having gone through the entire record including the order by which, bail application of the appellant has been rejected, impugned herein this appeal.

¶10

Nothing convincing has been argued on behalf of the complainant/State so as to justify and sustain the order passed by the court below rejecting the bail application of the appellant.

¶11

Thus, in view of the above and having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the evidence,

¶12

complicity of accused, I am of the view that the appellant has made out a case for bail.

¶13

Accordingly, this appeal is allowed and the impugned order dated 13.01.2021, rejecting the bail of the appellant is set aside.

¶14

Let the accused-appellant - Ghanaram Pal @ Vrandavan involved in the aforesaid case crime number for the aforesaid offences be released on bail on his furnishing personal bonds and two sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of Court concerned subject to the condition that appellant shall cooperate in the trial and will not jump the bail.

¶15

Order Date :- 13.8.2021 S Rawat

Ghanaram Pal @ Vindrawan v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ghanaram Pal @ Vindrawan v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Alankar Mishra Vs State of U.P. and Another

Devesh Dixit Vs State of U.P.

Rajesh and Another Vs State of Up and Another

Sanjay Yadav Vs State of U.P. and Another

Pragya Chaturvedi @ Pragya Suri and Another Vs State of U.P.

Ale Hasan Vs State of U.P.