Suttlekar drain case petition allowed, dismissed as withdrawn.
Withdrawal application allowed; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 39
Case :- CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL No. - 123 of 2008 Appellant :- M/S U.G.Sugar Industries Respondent :- Commissioner Of Central Excise Counsel for Appellant :- A.P.Mathur Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,Anjana Singh,B.K.S. Raghuvanshi,C.S.C.,Prateek Chandra
Hon'ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.
Order on Withdrawal Application No.03 of 2020 :-
Ms. Anjana Singh learned counsel has received notice on behalf of the respondent-department.
Sri A.P. Mathur learned counsel for the appellant seeks to press the withdrawal application.
The withdrawal application is allowed.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order Date :- 17.3.2021 Himanshu
M/S U.G. Sugar Industries
Commissioner Of Central Excise
Sunita Agarwal
Deepak Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
