In the absence of the applicant, the Court found that the impugned judgment had been complied with or the parties lost interest. Consequently, the contempt application was dismissed as needless to keep pending.
The contempt application was dismissed with no direction to initiate proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 4
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 450 of 2013
Applicant :- Veer Pal
Opposite Party :- Omveer Singh Canara Bank Head Branch Office Counsel for Applicant :- Rajesh K.S. Chaudhary Counsel for Opposite Party :- S.C.,Siddharth
Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.
List has been revised but nobody is present on behalf of the applicant.
The applicant is before this Court for a direction to initiate contempt proceeding against the opposite party for wilful disobedience of the judgement and order dated 31.01.2012 passed in Writ Petition No.5329 of 2012 (Veer Pal Vs. State of U.P. and others).
From perusal of the record, it appears that either the order of the writ Court has been complied with or the parties have lost their interest.
In the circumstances, it is needless to keep pending this contempt application.
In view of the same, the present contempt application is dismissed.
Order Date :- 25.8.2021 Pramod Tripathi
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present contempt application should be dismissed in the absence of the applicant and apparent compliance.
Veer Pal
Omveer Singh
Prakash Padia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
