The applicant filed a contempt petition for flouting an order expediting a mutation case. The court found no wilful disobedience and disposed of the petition as withdrawn.
Petition disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to make an appropriate expedite application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 2
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1167 of 2021
Applicant :- Panmati Devi Opposite Party :- Jitendra Singh. Tehsildar Counsel for Applicant :- Dhirendra Singh
Hon'ble Suneet Kumar,J.
Lawyers are abstaining from judicial work.
The instant contempt petition has been filed for flouting the order dated 20.2.2020 passed in Writ Petition (C) No. 6110 of 2020, for expediting Mutation Case No. 250 of 2018 (Computerized No.T-201815090700750) expeditiously.
From perusal of the record, it is apparent that there is no wilful or deliberate disobedience on the part of the opposite party in complying the order of this Court.
In view thereof, petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to the applicant to make an appropriate expedite application. In the event, such an application is filed, the same shall be decided in accordance with law.
Order Date :- 1.3.2021 Mukesh Kr.
Panmati Devi
Jitendra Singh
Suneet Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
