Allowed

Fahimuddin Alias Guddu v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC18 Feb 2021BAIL/9081/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail application under Section 3/4 of the Muslim Women Act, 2019, the Allahabad High Court, relying on the case of Data Ram, allowed the applicant's request for bail during the trial subject to conditions, dismissing the State's opposition.

What did the court decide?

The applicant be released on bail on executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each, subject to conditions of attending trial and not tampering with witnesses or indulging in illegal activ

Fahimuddin Alias Guddu Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2021)

¶1

Court No. - 90

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9081 of 2021

¶3

Applicant :- Fahimuddin Alias Guddu Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Joun Abbas,Sayyed Kashif Abbas Rizvi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Ajit Singh,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record.

¶6

By means of this application, the applicant who is involved in Case Crime No. 246 of 2020, under Section 3/4 Muslim Women Act, 2019, P.S. Nagphani, district-Moradabad, is seeking enlargement on bail during the trial.

¶7

Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case with malafide intention for the purpose of harassment. He next submits that by the mutual consent the informant and the applicant have dissolved their marriage nine months ago. Further submission is that for the said offence the conviction is of three years and the offence is triable by the court of Magistrate. He lastly submitted that the applicant has no criminal history and he is languishing in jail since 29.12.2020 and in case he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in trial.

¶8

The prayer for bail has been vehemently opposed by learned A.G.A.

¶9

Keeping in view the nature of the offence, evidence, complicity of the accused, severity of the punishment, submissions of learned counsel for the parties, considering the law laid down in the case of Data Ram Vs. State of U.P. and others, 2018(3) SCC 22 and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court is of the view that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail during the pendency of the trial.

¶10

Let the applicant, Fahimuddin Alias Guddu involved in the aforesaid case be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the following conditions:-

¶11

The applicant will continue to attend and co-operate in the trial pending before the court concerned on the date fixed after release.

¶12

He will not tamper with the witnesses.

¶13

He will not indulge in any illegal activities during the bail period.

¶14

It is further directed that the identity, status and residence proof of the sureties be verified by the authorities concerned before they are accepted.

¶15

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the trial court will be at liberty to cancel the bail.

¶16

The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad, self attested by learned counsel for the applicant along with a self attested identity proof of the said persons (preferably Aadhar Card) mentioning the mobile number (s) to which the said Aadhar Card is linked before the concerned Court/Authority/Official.

¶17

The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.

¶18

Order Date :- 18.2.2021 Faridul

Fahimuddin Alias Guddu v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Fahimuddin Alias Guddu v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Hamid Vs State of U.P.

Babloo Kannaujiya Vs State of U.P.

Banka Vs State of U.P.

Smt.Nirmala Devi Vs State of U.P.

Aszad and Another Vs State of U.P.

Arvind Vs State of U.P.