Allowed

Nandan Rajbhar v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC19 Feb 2021BAIL/8262/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court granted bail to the applicant, Nandan Rajbhar, under Section 28 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The release was conditional upon treating the accused as having a mental disorder, where subsequent proceedings for enhanced bail conditions will apply after a standard judicial order determines the extent.

What did the court decide?

The applicant was released on bail pending trial subject to the conditions laid down by the Supreme Court in Data Ram Singh.

Nandan Rajbhar Vs State of U.P. — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Allahabad HC (2021)

¶1

Court No. - 49

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 8262 of 2021

¶3

Applicant :- Nandan Rajbhar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Sanjeev Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary,J.

¶5

orZeku nkf.Md izdh.kZ tekur izkFkZuk i=] vkosnd uUnu jktHkj dh vksj ls eq0v0la0 0753 lu 2020] vUrxZr /kkjk 3(1) U.P. Gangsters & Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act 1986, Fkkuk lgtuok] ftyk xksj[kiqj esa tekur ij eqDr djus gsrq izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA

¶6

vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,o a fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks lquk rFkk i=koyh dk ifj’khyu fd;kA

¶7

vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk us rdZ izLrqr fd;k fd vkosnd dks bl izdj.k esa jaft’ku >wBk QWlk;k x;k gS] mlus dfFkr vijk/k dkfjr ugha fd;k gS] vkosnd ds fo:) xSax pkVZ esa nf’kZr fd, x, oknksa esa mldh tekur Lohd`r gks pqdh gS] bldk Li"Vhdj.k 'kiFki= esa fn;k x;k gS] vkosnd fdlh xSax dk yhMj ;k lnL; ugha gSA vkosnd funksZ"k gS rFkk og bl izdj.k esa fn0 15&9&2020 ls dkjkxkj es a fu:) gS] blfy, vkosnd dks tekur ij NksM+ fn;k tk;] tekur ij eqDr gksus ds i’pkr~ vkosnd Qjkj ugha gksxk vkSj u gh vfHk;kstu lkf{k;ksa dks izHkkfor djsxkA

¶8

fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk us vkosnd ds tekur dk fojks/k fd;kA

¶9

i=koyh ij miyC/k lkjoku rF;ksa] Hkkjrh; lafo/kku ds vuqPNsn 21 ,oa Dataram Singh

¶10

Vs. State of U.P. and another, reported in (2018) 3 SCC 22 ds izdj.k esa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk izfrikfnr vH;qfDr ds n`f"Vxr] okn ds xq.k nks"k ij fcuk dksbZ fVIi.kh fd, gq, vkosnd dks mijksDr of.kZr vijk/k esa lacaf/kr U;k;ky; dh lUrqf"V ij O;fDrxr ca/k&i= ,oa mlh /kujkf’k ds nks izfrHkw izLrqr djus ij fuEufyf[kr 'krksZ ds lkFk tekur ij NksM+ fn;k tk;A

¶11

1& vkosnd foospuk ;k ijh{k.k ds nkSjku lkf{k;ksa dks Mjk;sxk@/kedk;sxk ugha ,oa vfHk;kstu lk{; ds lkFk NsM+NkM+ ugha djsxkA

¶12

2& vkosnd ijh{k.k ds nkSjku fcuk dksbZ LFkxu fy, ijh{k.k esa bZekunkjh ls lg;ksx djsxkA

¶13

3& vkosnd tekur ij fjgk gksus ds ckn fdlh Hkh vijkf/kd xfrfof/k esa fyIr ugha gksxk u dksbZ vijkf/kd d`R; djsxkA

¶14

4& vkosnd dks ;fn ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; ds vkns’kksa ds rgr xfBr lfefr ds vkns’k ds vuqlkj vYidkfyd tekur ij c<+k;k x;k gS rks vYidkfyd tekur dh vof/k lekIr gksus ds ckn mldh tekur izHkkoh gksxhA

¶15

5& vnkyrksa ds lkekU; dkedkt ds cgky gksus rd vkosnd dks fcuk fdlh tekur ds futh eqpyds ij tekur ij c<+k;k tk,xkA vnkyr ds lkekU; dkedkt cgky gksus ds ckn vkjksih ,d eghus ds Hkhrj vnkyr dh larqf"V ds izfrHkqvksa dks izLrqr djsxkA

¶16

6& ikVhZ mPp U;k;ky; bykgkckn dh vkf/kdkfjd osclkbV ls MkmuyksM fd, x, bl rjg ds vkns’k dh daI;wVj tfur izfrfyfi nk;j djsxhA

¶17

7& lacaf/kr U;k;ky;@izkf/kdj.k@vf/kdkjh] mPp U;k;ky; bykgkckn dh vkf/kdkfjd osclkbV ls vkns’k dh ,slh dEI;wVjhd`r izfr dh lR;rk dh iqf"V djsxk vkSj fyf[kr :i ls bl rjg ds lR;kiu dh ?kks"k.k djsxkA

¶18

mijksDr 'krksZ esa ls fdlh ds mYya?ku ds ekeys esa] ;g tekur jn~n djus dk vk/kkj

¶19

gksxkA

¶20

fn0 % 19&02&2021 ds0lh0flag

¶21

2 of 2

Nandan Rajbhar v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nandan Rajbhar v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raja Vs State of U.P.

Praveen Kumar Vs State of U.P.

Mithun Dhobi Vs State of U.P.

Surendra Rao Vs State of U.P.

Harendra Alias B.P. Vs The State of U.P.

Vinod Yadav @ Vinod Kumar Yadav Vs State of U.P.