Allowed

Niraj Sharma v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC5 Feb 2021BAIL/4791/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed a bail application filed by Niraj Sharma in a cheating and criminal breach of trust case. The court ordered the applicant's release on bail subject to personal bond, two local sureties, and specific conditions regarding witness tampering and court attendance.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two local sureties subject to specific undertaking conditions.

Niraj Sharma Vs State of U.P. — Motor Accident Claims | Allahabad HC (2021)

¶1

Court No. - 70

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 4791 of 2021

¶3

Applicant :- Niraj Sharma Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ashok Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Ali Zamin,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A for the State and perused the material on record.

¶6

The present bail application has been filed by the applicant with a prayer to enlarge him on bail in Case Crime No. 242 of 2020, under Sections 406, 427, 411 IPC, P.S. Kaushambi, District Ghaziabad.

¶7

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that according to FIR, on 23.06.2020 at about 11.00 a.m. informant Gulshan Kumar parked his car bearing temporary no.UP-14 TC-0724 Mahendra XUV 300 and when he wanted his car it went missing. He further submits that after 20 days in front of house of sister of informant alleged car was found in abundant condition. He also submits that it is clear that to whom key of the car was given. He next submits that the applicant is a worker of the parking place and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. He further submits that there is no possibility of the applicant of fleeing away from the judicial process or tampering with the witnesses and, in case, the applicant is enlarged on bail, the applicant shall not misuse the liberty of bail and the applicant is languishing in jail since 19.10.2020.

¶8

Per contra, learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant.

¶9

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties, nature of the offence and perusing the material on record, without expressing any opinion on merit of the case the applicant is entitled for bail, let the applicant Niraj Sharma involved in aforesaid case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two local sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to the following conditions:-

¶10

(i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he will not tamper with the evidence and will not

¶11

pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses and will cooperate with the trial. The applicant shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.

¶12

(ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

(iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

(iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.

¶15

The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad.

¶16

The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground of cancellation of bail. He next submits that there is no possibility of the applicant of fleeing away from the judicial process or tampering with the witnesses and, in case, the applicant is enlarged on bail, the applicant shall not misuse the liberty of bail and the applicant is languishing in jail since 09.08.2020.

¶17

Order Date :- 5.2.2021 MAA/-

Niraj Sharma v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Niraj Sharma v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ram Sanjeevan Vs State of Up

Faisal Vs State of U.P.

Kasim Vs State of U.P.

Ajay Singh Vs State of U.P.

Akhilesh Kumar Mishra Vs State of U.P.

Ram Prasad Vs State of U.P.