Allowed

Vijay Singh @ Pappe v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC20 Jan 2021BAIL/47639/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this bail application, the Hon'ble Court granted bail to the applicant charged under Sections 302, 201 IPC, holding a parity position with co-accused, subject to conditions including prevention of witness tampering and attendance in court.

What did the court decide?

Release on personal bond and two local sureties subject to specified conditions prohibiting tampering with evidence and ensuring court attendance.

Vijay Singh @ Pappe Vs State of U.P. — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Allahabad HC (2021)

¶1

Court No. - 69

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 47639 of 2020

¶3

Applicant :- Vijay Singh @ Pappe Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Vijay Kumar Mishra,P.K. Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Neeraj Tiwari,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Ajay Kr. Pathak, brief holder for the State and perused the material placed on record.

¶6

Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that he has been falsely implicated in the present case. He next submitted that co-accused Vijay Kumar Sharma & Monu Sharma having an identical role have been enlarged on bail by this Court vide orders dated 21.10.2020 & 18.1.2021 in Criminal Misc. Bail Application Nos. 26997 of 2020 & 46395 of 2020. The case of applicant stands on similar footing, hence the applicant is also entitled for bail on the ground of parity. The applicant is languishing in jail since 11..6.2020 and he has no criminal history except the present case to his credit.

¶7

Sri Ajay Kr. Pathak, brief holder for the State has opposed the prayer for bail, but could not dispute the aforesaid facts.

¶8

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also perusing the material on record, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, let the applicant Vijay Singh @ Pappe , involved in Case Crime No. 445 of 2020, under Sections- 302, 201 IPC, Police Station- Tazganj, District- Agra be released on his furnishing a personal bond and two local sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of court concerned. It is further provided that this bail order available on the official website of the High Court will be taken to be the authentic one and certified copy shall be submitted before that court concerned as soon as it is issued.

¶9

This bail order would be subject to the fulfilment of following conditions:-

¶10

The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial.

¶11

The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.

¶12

The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.

¶13

The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code;

¶14

In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the Court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court default of this condition is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of his bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.

¶16

In case the applicant has been enlarged on short term bail as per the order of committee constituted under the orders of Hon'ble Supreme Court his bail shall be effective after the period of short term bail comes to an end.

¶17

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.

¶18

Order Date :- 20.1.2021 Junaid

Vijay Singh @ Pappe v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vijay Singh @ Pappe v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Salman Vs State of U.P.

Pintu Yadav Vs State of U.P.

Sonu Pinna @ Snil Mittal Vs State of U.P.

Satya Prakash Yadav Vs State of Up

Parasram Vs State of U.P.

Badshah Vs State of U.P.