Allowed

Agyaram v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC20 Jan 2021BAIL/47205/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is a bail application wherein the court granted bail to the applicant Agyaram under Sections 304, 308, 323, 504, 506, 188 IPC and Section 3 Pandemic Act, subject to standard conditions including appearance and non-intimidation of witnesses.

What did the court decide?

Applicant enlarged on bail by executing personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court.

Agyaram Vs State of U.P. — Narcotics (NDPS) | Allahabad HC (2021)

¶1

Court No. - 69

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 47205 of 2020

¶3

Applicant :- Agyaram Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Sandeep Kumar Singh,Santosh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Neeraj Tiwari,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Manoj Gautam, brief holder for the State.

¶6

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. Earlier an NCR was lodged on 2.7.2020 under Sections 323, 504 I.P.C. Thereafter, FIR was lodged on 3.7.2020 under Sections 308, 323, 504, 506, 188 I.P.C. and Section 3 Pandemic Act and later on under Section 304 I.P.C is added. Due to heavy rain, wall of the informant was fallen upon his wife causing injury and ultimately resulting into her death, but due to village party bandi, FIR has been lodged against the applicant. Applicant has no criminal history and he is in jail since 5.7.2020, undertakes that he will not misuse the liberty, if granted.

¶7

Learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the prayer but could not dispute the aforesaid facts.

¶8

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also perusing the material on record, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, let the applicant- Agyaram , involved in Case Crime No. 131 of 2020, under Sections- 304, 308, 323, 504, 506, 188 I.P.C. and Section 3 Pandemic Act, Police Station- Trilokpur, District Siddharth Nagar, be enlarged on bail on his executing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned. It is further provided that this bail order available on the official website of the High Court will be taken to be the authentic one and certified copy shall be submitted before that court concerned as soon as it is issued.

¶9

This bail order would be subject to the fulfilment of following conditions:-

¶10

The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial.

¶11

The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without

¶12

seeking any adjournment.

¶13

The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.

¶14

The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code;

¶15

In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the Court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶16

The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court default of this condition is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of his bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.

¶17

In case the applicant has been enlarged on short term bail as per the order of committee constituted under the orders of Hon'ble Supreme Court his bail shall be effective after the period of short term bail comes to an end.

¶18

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.

¶19

Order Date :- 20.1.2021

¶20

Arvind

Agyaram v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Agyaram v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Salman Vs State of U.P.

Pintu Yadav Vs State of U.P.

Sonu Pinna @ Snil Mittal Vs State of U.P.

Satya Prakash Yadav Vs State of Up

Parasram Vs State of U.P.

Badshah Vs State of U.P.