Allowed

Tuntun Dhobi and Another v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC12 Jan 2021BAIL/44051/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This bail application was allowed regarding charges under the U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities Act. The High Court held that the applicants made out a fit case for bail despite opposition regarding their alleged gang ties.

What did the court decide?

Applicants released on bail by furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each, subject to strict conditions regarding court attendance and behavior.

Tuntun Dhobi and Another Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2021)

¶1

Court No. - 72

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 44051 of 2020

¶3

Applicant :- Tuntun Dhobi And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Dinesh Kumar Gupta,Raghawendra Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Singh,J.

¶5

Supplementary affidavit filed today on behalf of the applicant is taken on record.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned Additional Government Advocate representing the State and perused the record of the case.

¶7

The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicants with a prayer to release them on bail in Case Crime No. 141 of 2020, under Section 2/3(1) of U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, police station Sahatwar, district Ballia during the pendency of trial.

¶8

It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicants that according to the gang chart the applicants are said to have been involved in one criminal case each in which they have already been enlarged on bail by the court concerned and the copies of the same have been annexed as annexure Nos. 1 and 2 to the supplementary affidavit filed in support of the application. They have falsely been implicated in the present case due to police rivalry. They are not a member of any gang. There is no prospect of trial of the present case being concluded in near future due to heavy dockets. The applicants are not a previous convict. The applicants are languishing in jail since 8.8.2020 and in case they are enlarged on bail they will not misuse the liberty of bail.

¶9

Per contra learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicants by contending that the applicants are the member of gang and habitual of committing crime. In case the applicants are released on bail they will again indulge in similar anti-social activities and will misuse the bail by extending threat and intimidation to the prosecution witnesses.

¶10

Keeping in view the nature of the offence, evidence, complicity of the accused, submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, I am of the view that the applicants have made out a fit case for bail. Hence, the bail application is hereby allowed.

¶11

Let the applicants Tuntun Dhobi and Dunmun Dhobi be released on bail in the aforesaid case crime number on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions which are being imposed in the interest of justice:-

¶12

(i) The applicants shall file an undertaking to the effect that they shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.

¶13

(ii) The applicants shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through their counsel. In case of their absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against them under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

(iii) In case, the applicants misuse the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure their presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicants fail to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against them, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

(iv) The applicants shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicants is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against them in accordance with law.

¶16

(v) The applicants shall file computer generated copy of this order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad.

¶17

(vi) The computer generated copy of this order shall be self attested by the counsel of the party concerned.

¶18

(vii) The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.

¶19

It is clarified that anything said in this order is limited to the purpose of determination of this bail application and will in no way be construed as an expression on the merits of the case. The trial court shall be absolutely free to arrive at its independent conclusions on the basis of evidence led unaffected by anything said in this order.

¶20

Order Date :- 12.1.2021

¶21

Sumaira

Tuntun Dhobi and Another v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tuntun Dhobi and Another v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ram Milan Bind Vs State of U.P.

Sebu @ Sajid Vs State of U.P.

Anil Kumar Pal Vs State of U.P.

Suhail Vs State of U.P.

Mursheed Vs State of U.P.

Rajan Trivedi Vs State of U.P.